Wives,
likewise, be submissive to your own husbands, that even if some do not obey the
word, they, without a word, may be won by the conduct of their wives, when they
observe your chaste conduct accompanied by fear. Do not let your adornment be
merely outward—arranging the hair, wearing gold, or putting on fine apparel—
rather let it be the hidden person of the heart, with the incorruptible beauty
of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is very precious in the sight of God. For
in this manner, in former times, the holy women who trusted in God also adorned
themselves, being submissive to their own husbands, as Sarah obeyed Abraham,
calling him lord, whose daughters you are if you do good and are not afraid
with any terror. – 1
Peter 3.1-6
This husband/wife thing is one of those that is always
difficult for a preacher to deal with. Since in our circles nearly all
preachers (and Bible teachers) and men it can seem like we are
preaching/teaching to suit ourselves.
But here it is, in the word of God and taught by both
Paul and Peter. Those of us who are in happy Christian homes where husband and
wife both strive to realise our tasks, we know that it ‘works’ We know it is
not a matter of a tyrant and subject. We know how it plays out and it plays out
in a wonderful way.
We also must remember that these teachings are not about
relations between all men and all women. Women are not subject to men just
because they are men. This is all about a husband and wife who both desire to
please God. And if we are striving to please God we are sure to please each
other.
Here we find an example though of a wife who is
married to a man who ‘does not obey the word.’ Now that’s a tough situation to
address. Does a Christian wife need to submit to a non-Christian husband?
When Peter wrote these words the church was still
young. Most of these ‘mixed marriages’ came because either the husband or wife
got saved and their spouse did not. I am sure there were great debates about
whether or not Christian should maintain such a marriage. Paul addresses that and
so does Peter, from slightly different perspectives.
Peter says that as long as the lost husband is not
leaving the relationship the wife should submit to his leadership. Obviously,
there is a measure of common sense here. No one should submit to abuse be it
physical, emotional, sexual, or whatever. But generally a Christian wife should
submit to her husband’s leadership.
Why? That through her conduct she might win her
husband to Christ. Leaving a lost husband ‘just because’ he is lost is not
God’s way. We have a good friend who was saved after she was married. She
struggled at submitting in a simple matter, but this is an example of what this
passage says. She did not like going to buy beer for her husband. It went
against her personal choice. But then she realised ‘He is the same man I
married, I am the one who changed.’ Once she did want he wanted and he realised
how hard it was for her to do it he didn’t ask her again. He is not yet saved,
but he enjoys their Christian friends and often attends church on special occasions.
It just makes sense. If someone gets saved before
their spouse it is not fair to them to leave just because they are a Christian.
In fact, it ought to be a strong motivation to stay.
There is more here, but I’ll leave that for now.
No comments:
Post a Comment